![]() 10/24/2013 at 19:51 • Filed to: fiveminutephotoshop, datass | ![]() | ![]() |
Edit - I added the banner on the wall behind her. That's the logo for control top underpants.
I also posted it in the Gizmodo article - !!!error: Indecipherable SUB-paragraph formatting!!!
![]() 10/24/2013 at 19:53 |
|
Great, now Party-vi is going to make a total mess in here. I'm not cleaning it up.
![]() 10/24/2013 at 19:55 |
|
It's SPANX, not SPANKS!
/youguys
![]() 10/24/2013 at 19:59 |
|
I'm not complaining...
![]() 10/24/2013 at 20:03 |
|
NO. NO. This is not allowed here. We don't have a lot of rules or moral codes or 'no-no's but you have crossed the line, sir.
![]() 10/24/2013 at 20:15 |
|
DAT
![]() 10/24/2013 at 20:36 |
|
Would it be cool if Kim had a slightly smaller ass?
Also I'm going to need you to quote the referenced code, counselor.
![]() 10/24/2013 at 20:46 |
|
Rule 1.1 (a) no Kardashian — go to gawker for that.
![]() 10/24/2013 at 20:47 |
|
Sustained.
![]() 10/24/2013 at 20:59 |
|
Am I the only one who thinks "Gross"?
![]() 10/24/2013 at 21:14 |
|
nope .
![]() 10/24/2013 at 21:23 |
|
Thanks. Needed to know I'm not entirely crazy.
![]() 10/24/2013 at 21:27 |
|
i'm an ass man , but she is just all out of proportion ... J-Lo too ... yeah I said it .
![]() 10/24/2013 at 21:29 |
|
Don't care for the K's but, you gotta admit, dat ass
![]() 10/24/2013 at 21:32 |
|
Your honor, bringing the item into the proceedings was an attempt at humor. This overplayed, often ridiculed self photo (aka "selfie") posted on Instagram had been altered. It has been altered by adding a "Spanx" (a control top undergarment worn to tame datass) banner ad on the wall behind the woman.
With Instagram ads in our neat future, suggesting that ironic or inappropriate ads be added to ridiculed photos was an attempt at a joke.
I hope the court forgives me. Because fiveminutephotoshop.
..and sideboob.
![]() 10/24/2013 at 21:33 |
|
Definitely, everyone looks at me like I'm nuts when I say she's not attractive. Yick.
![]() 10/24/2013 at 22:19 |
|
DAT ASS